User talk:CannedLizard

Hello! I'm sure someone will be coming by with a nice message, complete with useful links, but I wanted to be the first to welcome you to Wikipedia! :D Mike H 00:21, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)

No problem! Hey, if you want to indent for replies, you just use the colon. For one reply, one colon, and two for two replies, etc. If you want to sign your name, like I did, use three tildes (three of ~). To put a timestamp, put four tildes. Mike H 00:28, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)

CS comparison

Great comparison! I resized it to be 800x600 compliant. I wanted to ask if you could make another version with a higher resolution. It should remain approximately the size I changed it to on the Counter-Strike article; but it would be sweet if a more detailed comparison could be had for novices and veterans alike who click on the image. Thanks. - RoyBoy [∞] 23:17, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks alot. Oh, and thanks for mentioning the 800x600 compliancy, I'm relatively new to Wiki, so don't know all the rules (my goddess, so many). I'm afraid the orginal was not by me (as I noted on the picture's page), and I don't at the moment have access to 1.6. I might take another screenshot off the internet, and then take a comparitive one in CS:S, but that will wait until I have a bit more time. CannedLizard 23:29, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

No worries. I still have 1.6 so I could do it. Anything I should know on making it similar to the ones shown? For example I can run a 1.6 server and teleport a player to specific coordinates. Did you simply manually fire the gun and get a screen cap mid-recoil; or is there a way to make the gun permanently open? We could choose a new location but I'm partial to that location given its familiarity. However if there is another map/location that better contrasts the engines I'm all for that. I've only dabbled with Source so that would be up to you, and of course there isn't anything stopping us from multiple comparisons. Although if we did a bunch of pics Wikipedia might prefer us to upload it to Wikicommons. - RoyBoy [∞] 00:34, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I just made a game, walked to the point where the original screenshot was taken (a little bit of guesswork, but 100% accuracy is difficult, if not impossible due to map changes). I manually fired the gun, taking three screenshots, and I used the one that showed the gun in the process of firing. The most popular maps are de_dust and dust2, but aztec might be better for a comparison (especially if we can show water splashes and other changes). cs_office and italy might also be good. Of those 5, I think that either aztec or office would show the biggest engine changes. One thing to note is my current main computer is down, so I'm on my parent's computer which doesn't have the greatest of graphics cards. I wouldn't be able to show water at it's best, and windows turn into wireframes when they break. I must admit the idea of doing a collection of comparisons at Wikicommons sounds good, and something worth looking into (and I'm assuming stuff with the screenshot copyright tag is allowed over there). CannedLizard 01:07, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Yeah the policy should be the same. Well no rush, we want top quality so whenever you get to it will be fine. I've posted on the Village pump to get instruction on policy on which project to upload to. My usual resolution is 800x600 but I could go to 1024x768 for screenshots. - RoyBoy [∞] 20:30, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Well you were right, as copyrighted work the screenshots cannot be included in the Wikicommons. So that will somewhat limit our plans, but onward and forward!:-D - RoyBoy [∞] 02:09, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hmm, waiting may take awhile, and as long as it doesn't involve water and broken windows in any great detail, I can get good screenshots (800x600 is what I run it on, so that's good). Anything in particular you think we should showcase? CannedLizard 22:19, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I think we should replicate the original screenshot of dust (perhaps a few feet further down, whatever looks best in Source), then do the exterior of the office to showcase lighting (unless there is a better lighting example), and then an exterior of Aztec or Italy to show background improvement. Then there would be CT & T model comparisons for the defaults when using cl_minmodels. I assume the default models are the same types in 1.6 and Source. I suppose the model captures should be cropped to allow quicker comparison that fits on a screen. Sound good? - RoyBoy [∞] 00:29, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Okay, I've taken five screenshots from cs_office, tell me what you think. http://photobucket.com/albums/v354/CannedLizard/CSSource%20Comparison/ CannedLizard 01:51, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I love the projecter pic, I hadn't of thought of that. With a little gamma correction (to see the objects clearer), it will be the ideal Office pic. It shows lighting well, the detail in background objects and the better hostage models (and icons). I don't think I'd use any of the rest... although I like the idea of having CT and T next to each other it would be better to have them standing to also compare posture between 1.6 and Source. And just to be safe we don't want any names (handles) in the screen... it could be seen as self-promotional by some admins. - RoyBoy [∞] 04:17, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Actually we should make a comparison between kill messaging so we can't avoid names. If you got a closer capture of the models (obviously without getting them out of screen) in another cool location, then that could serve a dual purpose as model/Aztec environment comparison. Making for less uploads. Don't worry about getting CT and T together if that will be difficult, focus on getting close and a nice background, perhaps even a nice gun to show gun modeling differences. - RoyBoy [∞] 04:28, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Office image added!

Done. - RoyBoy [∞] 05:07, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Classic Rock

Hello. I was wondering if you would like to participate in my classic rock survey. I'm trying to find the most liked classic rock song. There is more information on my user page. Hope you participate! RENTASTRAWBERRY ^{FOR LET?} röck 02:59, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Canada

Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 02:10, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Save the Game!

Help us track down verifiable sources to bring The Game back! Go to SaveTheGame.org! Bkkbrad 19:49, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Double-quote redirects

Can you please explain why you redirected something in double single quotes? I just don't see any possible value in that and was wondering if you could explain. --Cyde↔Weys 17:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was me being very tired and editing Wiki...which isn't the best idea. --CannedLizard 17:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Libertines-album.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Libertines-album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 08:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Freelancer-Hispania.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Freelancer-Hispania.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2009

Support TORONTO in its bid to become the host city of WIKIMANIA 2009 Visit m:Wikimania 2009/Toronto for TORONTO's MetaWiki page and help build a strong bid.
Toronto Candidate City for Wikimania 2009

-- Zanimum 15:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Remembrance...

--nat ^{Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?!} 23:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Freelancer-Hispania.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Freelancer-Hispania.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Counterstrike-comparison.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Counterstrike-comparison.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Counterstrike-comparison.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Counterstrike-comparison.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:35, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CannedLizard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]